Author: admin

ARA Freight Market: Light Ends Lead Midweek Surge as Barge Availability Tightens

The ARA barge freight market experienced a distinctly dynamic week from 19 to 23 January, characterized by alternating momentum and a clear divergence between product groups. While the week opened calmly, midweek saw a sharp acceleration in activity, driven primarily by light ends demand and temporary tightening in barge availability. By Friday, the market had stabilized again, with rates holding firm after absorbing the surge in volumes.

Overall, the week illustrated a market that remains highly responsive to short-term availability and terminal logistics, rather than underpinned by sustained demand growth.

1. Freight Rates: Light Ends Strengthen, Distillates Largely Stable

  • 19 January: The week began on a measured and orderly note. Middle distillate freight rates remained broadly stable, with most deals concluded on a PJK basis. In contrast, light ends already showed early signs of strength, supported by modestly higher fixing levels and active enquiries.
  • 20 January: Freight rates adjusted selectively. Middle distillates edged slightly lower on some routes as availability improved, while light ends retained their firmer tone, widening the gap between the two product groups.
  • 21 January: The market reached its most active point of the week. Spot volumes surged past the psychological level of 100 kton, and freight rates increased for both product groups, with light ends leading the move. Temporary scarcity of suitable barges allowed operators to push rates higher, while some offers were rejected due to full schedules.
  • 22 January: Following the previous day’s surge, activity dropped sharply. Despite lower volumes, light-end rates remained supported, as many operators were already booked into the following week. Middle distillates saw limited movement, reinforcing a sideways trend.
  • 23 January: The week closed with moderately improved activity and broadly unchanged freight rates. With most new deals concluded on a PJK basis and barge availability constrained until mid-next week, pricing stabilized across all routes.

Takeaway: Freight rates followed a stable to divergent and firm sideways trajectory, with light ends clearly setting the tone.

2. Spot Activity: Sharp Midweek Peak, Rapid Cooldown

  • Activity started the week at solid but unspectacular levels.
  • A significant midweek spike occurred on 21 January, driven by light ends demand, blending activity, and ongoing terminal delays.
  • Volumes fell back sharply on 22 January before recovering modestly on Friday.

Takeaway: This pattern highlights the event-driven nature of the ARA spot market, where short-lived disruptions can trigger outsized reactions.

3. Product Dynamics: Gap Between Light Ends and Distillates Widens

Light ends

  • Consistently outperformed middle distillates throughout the week.
  • Benefited from export-related blending activity and terminal delays, particularly in Amsterdam.
  • Encountered periods of barge scarcity midweek, enabling higher pricing.

Middle distillates

  • Remained comparatively stable.
  • Activity increased midweek but did not translate into sustained upward rate pressure.
  • Many fixtures were concluded on PJK or lump-sum basis, muting price volatility.

4. Operational Context: Delays and Scheduling Constraints Drive Pricing

Operational factors played a decisive role:

  • Persistent terminal delays at locations including Amsterdam and Botlek disrupted planning and reduced flexibility.
  • A large share of the fleet became fully scheduled into the following week, limiting spot availability even as activity dipped.
  • Operators prioritized schedule integrity over aggressive pricing once midweek demand was absorbed.

Conclusion

The ARA barge freight market during 19–23 January was shaped by short-term tightening rather than structural change. After a calm start, a sharp midweek surge, driven primarily by light ends demand and temporary barge scarcity, pushed freight rates higher and briefly tightened the market. Once this demand was absorbed, activity cooled quickly, but pricing remained supported due to constrained availability and full forward schedules. The week ultimately closed in balance, with light ends maintaining a premium over middle distillates and the ARA market once again demonstrating its sensitivity to operational disruption rather than sustained demand shifts.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

Rhine Freight Market: Hydrology-Driven Firmness Peaks Midweek Before Market Pauses

The Rhine barge freight market during 19–23 January displayed a clear two-phase pattern: an active and increasingly firm start driven by falling water levels, followed by a pronounced slowdown as charterers stepped back and operators shifted focus to keeping the fleet running rather than new fixing. Throughout the week, restricted intakes on the Middle and Upper Rhine remained the dominant driver of freight sentiment, outweighing fluctuations in demand.

1. Freight Rates: Early Firming Gives Way to Sideways Movement

  • 19 January: The week opened with rising activity and firming freight sentiment, particularly for Upper Rhine destinations. Falling water levels translated into lower intakes, pushing operators to seek higher compensation for reduced cargo sizes. Charterers showed less appetite for prompt Upper Rhine movements as rates climbed, reinforcing the hydrology-led nature of the move.
  • 20 January: Freight rates increased further across Middle and Upper Rhine routes, supported by stronger late-day interest leading to a widening pricing gap between Swiss destinations and other locations. Operators increasingly prioritized longer-haul voyages upstream, while German and French routes saw comparatively less spot activity.
  • 21 January: Despite a slight slowdown in charterer enquiries, rates continued to edge higher on most routes, as ongoing delays and further intake restrictions tightened effective capacity. Scheduling difficulties, caused by terminal congestion along the Rhine and in ARA, kept operators busy and supported firmer pricing.
  • 22 January: Freight rates strengthened again on Upper Rhine routes, even as charterers became more hesitant and preferred to wait for forecasted higher water levels later in the following week. Backwardation in gasoil markets discouraged stockpiling, but intake restrictions continued to outweigh softer demand.
  • 23 January: The market cooled markedly. With most weekly volumes already covered and many barges fully booked into the following week, freight rates moved sideways, pausing after several days of incremental gains. Expectations of rising water levels contributed to a wait-and-see attitude.

Takeaway: Freight rates followed a firm to firmer then a sudden pause trajectory, driven almost entirely by water level constraints rather than demand growth.

2. Water Levels: Persistent Pressure, Hopes of Relief

Water levels shaped every trading decision during the week:

  • Kaub and Maxau trended steadily lower, further restricting intakes for 110-metre barges and keeping loadings well below normal levels for this time of the year.
  • By Friday, forecasts pointed to a potential uptick in water levels in the following week, prompting some charterers to delay fixing and easing immediate rate pressure.

Takeaway: This evolving outlook explains why the market firmed early, then stalled.

3. Market Activity: Busy Start, Quiet Finish

  • Activity was robust at the beginning of the week, with numerous renominations and operational adjustments caused by earlier delays in ARA and along the Rhine.
  • Midweek participation remained healthy but increasingly selective, as higher freight levels discouraged discretionary movements.
  • By 23 January, spot activity dropped sharply, reflecting a market that had largely completed its fixing program for the days to come.

4. Operational Context: Delays and Planning Complexity

Operational factors amplified the impact of low water levels:

  • Delays at terminals in Antwerp, Amsterdam, Bottrop, and along the Rhine complicated voyage planning and extended turnaround times.
  • Operators spent much of the week managing schedules and delayed barges, reducing focus on chasing new spot business.
  • Some market participants increasingly favored inland loading and downstream/domestic trips to limit exposure to congestion and intake risk.

Conclusion

The Rhine barge freight market during 19–23 January was a textbook example of a hydrology-driven tightening phase. Falling water levels on the Middle and Upper Rhine restricted intakes and steadily pushed freight rates higher through midweek, even as demand softened and charterers grew cautious. Once most weekly volumes were secured and forecasts hinted at improving river conditions, activity dropped sharply, and rates stabilized. The market closed the week firm but paused, with the next directional move likely to depend less on demand and more on whether the anticipated water level recovery materializes.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

ARA Freight Market: Mid-January Activity Surge Brings Short-Lived Firmness Before Stabilization

The ARA barge freight market during 12–16 January transitioned from a cautious start into one of the most active weeks of the young year, before settling back into a more balanced state by Friday. Strong midweek volumes, driven by ICE-related positioning and renewed distillate flows, briefly tightened barge availability and lifted freight sentiment. However, this support proved temporary, as improved vessel positioning and the conclusion of urgent business brought rates back into line by the end of the week.

1. Freight Rates: Early Softness, Midweek Firming, Late-Week Balance

  • 12 January: The week opened on a soft note, with middle-distillate freight rates edging lower amid low spot liquidity and widespread terminal delays. Light ends saw little activity and insufficient liquidity to influence pricing meaningfully.
  • 13 January: Activity picked up sharply, and middle-distillate rates increased across nearly all ARA, Flushing, and Ghent routes. ICE gasoil expiry stimulated distillate trading, while light ends remained thinly traded, limiting price impact for that segment.
  • 14 January: The market remained active, and freight rates firmed further for middle distillates, supported by strong volumes and tighter near-term availability. Light ends were more active in volume but largely fixed on a PJK basis, resulting in stable published levels.
  • 15 January: Spot volumes surged to the highest level of the week, marking the first three-digit daily total of the year. Light ends showed signs of strengthening, while middle-distillate rates held broadly stable as most urgent demand had already been absorbed.
  • 16 January: The week ended quietly. Activity halved compared to the previous day, and freight rates stabilized across most routes, with only minor technical adjustments linked to parcel sizes and deal structure rather than market direction.

Takeaway: Freight rates followed a soft to firm then to flat pattern, with midweek tightness proving transitory.

2. Spot Activity: Strong Midweek, Calm Finish

  • Volumes were below average on 12 January, reflecting delayed start-of-week engagement.
  • 13–15 January saw a powerful rebound, with daily volumes rising sharply and peaking above the psychological 100-kton mark on Thursday.
  • By 16 January, activity dropped significantly as operators focused on weekend scheduling rather than new fixing.

Takeaway: This pattern underscores how calendar effects and ICE positioning, rather than sustained demand growth, drove the midweek surge.

3. Product Dynamics: Distillates Drive the Market, Light Ends Follow

Middle distillates

  • Led the midweek rally in both volume and pricing.
  • Benefited from ICE-related trading and tighter availability early in the week.
  • Stabilized once urgent demand was cleared.

Light ends

  • Initially quiet, then increasingly active later in the week.
  • Pricing responded more cautiously, with many deals concluded on PJK or lump-sum basis.
  • Showed modest strengthening on Thursday before flattening again.

4. Operational Context: Delays, Renominations, and Absorption of Supply

Operational factors played a supporting role:

  • Terminal delays at Amsterdam Eurotank, Standic Dordrecht, and Vesta Flushing early in the week caused renominations and temporarily reduced flexibility.
  • By midweek, operators reported limited remaining capacity, especially for prompt distillate movements.
  • As the week progressed, improved vessel positioning absorbed the earlier tightness, restoring balance by Friday.

Conclusion

The ARA barge freight market during 12–16 January showcased a short but pronounced mid-January tightening phase, driven by ICE-related distillate activity and a sharp rise in spot volumes. Freight rates firmed accordingly, particularly for middle distillates, before stabilizing as urgent demand was satisfied and vessel availability improved. By week’s end, the market had returned to equilibrium, with rates reflecting operational normalization rather than structural tightness, suggesting that any further movement will depend on sustained demand rather than calendar-driven surges.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

Rhine Freight Market: Persistent Low Water Levels Drive Gradual Rate Increases

The Rhine barge freight market during 12–16 January continued to be dominated by hydrological constraints, with persistently low water levels shaping both operational decisions and freight sentiment. While overall activity fluctuated through the week, the structural tightening caused by reduced intakes led to incremental freight rate increases, particularly for Middle and Upper Rhine destinations.

The week illustrated a market that is not demand-led, but logistics-led, where pricing strength stems from capacity constraints rather than cargo urgency.

1. Freight Rates: Stepwise Increases as Intake Restrictions Deepen

  • 12 January: Freight rates were mostly stable. Spot activity was healthy, but charterers remained cautious, waiting for clarity on water levels. With intakes already restricted, rates held firm.
  • 13–14 January: As water levels were forecast to drop further, Upper Rhine routes saw rate increases. Lower Rhine destinations stayed mostly unchanged. Operators successfully negotiated higher rates to offset reduced intake volumes.
  • 15–16 January: Spot activity slowed, but rates firmed further, particularly on Middle Rhine and Basel routes. Reduced weekend and forward loadings drove higher pricing, even as deal numbers fell.

Takeaway: Freight rates rose gradually, driven by intake limitations rather than demand.

2. Water Levels: Structural Constraint Remains in Place

Hydrological conditions remained the central market driver:

  • Kaub stayed around the mid-150 cm range for most of the week, limiting intake volumes and forcing nominations well below full barge capacity.
  • Maxau trended lower throughout the week and was forecast to drop below key psychological thresholds in the following days, adding further uncertainty for Upper Rhine logistics.
  • Forecasts showed little to no precipitation, reinforcing expectations of continued restrictions into the following week.

Takeaway:  Intakes were commonly reduced to 1,000–1,200 tons, significantly affecting voyage economics.

3. Market Activity: Uneven Participation, Fewer Deals Late Week

  • Early in the week, activity was stronger as charterers adjusted to post-holiday logistics.
  • Midweek activity remained steady, driven by necessity rather than discretionary flows.
  • By Thursday and Friday, deal numbers dropped sharply as many barges were already scheduled.

Takeaway: Even with fewer deals, freight sentiment stayed firm due to tight effective capacity.

4. Operational Context: Tight Scheduling and Risk-Priced Freight

Operationally, the market reflected a cautious but firm stance:

  • Limited barge availability reflected scheduled fleets rather than a lack of vessels.
  • Operators priced freight to manage revenue risk from restricted intakes and longer turnaround times.
  • Forward loadings indicated expectations of continued firmness if water levels remained low.

Conclusion

From 12–16 January, the Rhine barge market showed that hydrology, not demand, drives freight dynamics. Low water levels restricted barge intakes, gradually tightening effective capacity and supporting higher freight rates. Spot activity became more selective late in the week, while operators continued to price in logistical risk. With little immediate relief in forecasts, the market remained structurally tight upstream, setting the stage for a firm start to the second half of January.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

ARA Freight Market: Early-January Rebalancing Brings Volatility Before Stabilization

The ARA barge freight market during 5–9 January reflected a classic post-holiday rebalancing phase, with fluctuating activity levels, alternating rate pressure, and a gradual move toward equilibrium by the end of the week. After an initially soft reopening, midweek activity accelerated sharply before easing again as barge availability and demand found better alignment.

Overall, the market transitioned from oversupplied and price-sensitive conditions toward a more balanced state, particularly for middle distillates.

1. Freight Rates: Early Softness, Midweek Divergence, Late Stabilization

  • 5 January: The market reopened quietly. Freight rates showed small mixed adjustments, with minor upward and downward movements reflecting low liquidity and cautious fixing behavior. Most business was concluded on a PJK B/L basis, signaling unclear direction.
  • 6 January: Weak demand and growing barge availability led to broad rate softening across both middle distillates and light ends. Operators accepted lower levels to keep vessels employed, despite ongoing terminal delays and rising demand for heated barges.
  • 7 January: Market sentiment improved markedly. Spot volumes surged, and the balance between barge supply and demand was widely described as well-matched.
  • 8 January: Activity remained solid but began to cool. With many barges already booked, deals were concluded at slightly lower average levels, resulting in small downward corrections across both product groups.
  • 9 January: The week closed on a stable note. Freight rates were largely unchanged, with only marginal adjustments for light ends, while middle distillates held steady. The market finished the week calm and orderly, with no signs of immediate imbalance.

Takeaway: Freight rates moved from a larger gap between distillates and light ends, to a narrow gap, reflecting the market’s process of recalibrating after the holidays.

2. Spot Activity: Strong Midweek Rebound

  • Activity was modest on 5–6 January, as charterers cautiously re-entered the market.
  • 7 January marked a turning point, with volumes nearly tripling compared to the previous day, driven by renewed fixing interest and a more even supply-demand balance
  • Volumes remained healthy on 8–9 January, though slightly lower as many barges were already fixed and charterers completed their immediate requirements

Takeaway: The volume pattern underscored that logistics normalization, rather than consumption growth, was driving early-January activity.

3. Product Dynamics: Light Ends More Reactive Than Distillates

Middle distillates

  • Displayed relative stability by the end of the week.
  • Briefly softened midweek as availability improved.
  • Benefited from balanced barge supply once the initial January surge passed.

Light ends

  • Displayed different directions throughout the week, declining early in the week before rebounding strongly on 7 January.
  • Ended the week with small corrective moves as supply caught up with demand.

Takeaway: This divergence reinforced the pattern as seen earlier of light ends reacting faster to short-term shifts in availability.

4. Operational Context: Availability Improves, Constraints Ease

Operationally, the week was shaped by:

  • Terminal delays early in the period (Standic, Eurotank Amsterdam, Vopak Vlaardingen, Botlek), which temporarily constrained flexibility
  • Rising availability of non-heated barges, while heated barges remained scarce, occasionally commanding premiums.
  • By week’s end, fewer empty barges were reported, signaling a well-absorbed fleet

Conclusion

The ARA barge freight market during 5–9 January underwent a rapid but orderly post-holiday adjustment. Initial softness driven by excess availability gave way to a midweek surge in activity, before the market settled into a more balanced configuration by Friday. Freight rates reflected this evolution, with early declines, midweek divergence between product groups, and eventual stabilization. As operational disruptions eased and barge supply aligned more closely with demand, the ARA market closed the week steady and positioned for a more structurally driven phase in the second half of January.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

Rhine Freight Market: Water Level Uncertainty Caps Momentum in Early January

The Rhine barge freight market started the new year with cautious re-engagement, as most market participants returned from the holidays but remained reluctant to commit to prompt spot business. While activity gradually improved over the course of the week, uncertainty around water level forecasts continued to dominate sentiment, resulting in selective rate increases rather than a broad-based move.

Overall, the period from 5 to 9 January reflected a market searching for direction, balancing low water constraints against expectations of near-term recovery.

1. Freight Rates: Selective Firming, No Uniform Direction

  • 5 January: The week opened on a stable note, with freight rates unchanged across most destinations. Although holiday disruptions were behind the market, charterers showed limited urgency, preferring to wait for clearer water level signals before fixing additional volumes.
  • 6 January: Freight rates increased on selected Upper Rhine destinations, reflecting tighter intake limitations and stronger demand from Swiss counterparties. Elsewhere, rates remained steady as mixed holiday participation limited overall liquidity.
  • 7 January: Activity picked up further midweek, leading to small upward adjustments on Lower and Middle Rhine routes. Despite improved activity, several charterers postponed decisions, anticipating better intake conditions later in the week.
  • 8 January: The market cooled again. As forecasts shifted toward rising water levels over the weekend, pressure emerged on freight rates, and some deals were concluded at slightly lower levels, resulting in minor downward adjustments on a few routes.
  • 9 January: The week ended quietly, with freight rates unchanged. Limited spot interest and constantly shifting hydrological forecasts led many participants to defer decisions into the following week

Takeaway: Freight rates moved incrementally and inconsistently, with water level expectations outweighing short-term demand signals.

2. Water Levels: Forecast Volatility Shapes Behavior

Hydrology remained the primary influence throughout the week:

  • Kaub stayed at very low levels early in the week, significantly limiting barge intakes and supporting higher pricing on Upper Rhine routes.
  • Maxau showed signs of recovery midweek, with forecasts suggesting rising levels toward the weekend, easing intake concerns.
  • The daily revisions to forecasts created hesitation, with charterers unwilling to lock in rates amid uncertain loading conditions.

Takeaway: This forecast volatility prevented a decisive market move in either direction.

3. Market Activity: Gradual Improvement, Still Below Seasonal Norms

  • Activity was modest at the start of the week, as offices reopened and operational backlogs were addressed.
  • Midweek participation increased, particularly for Lower Rhine destinations, but remained uneven across regions.
  • By Friday, activity slowed again as participants deferred fixing to assess post-weekend water levels.

Takeaway: Overall, spot volumes improved compared to late December but remained below typical January averages.

4. Operational Context: Caution Over Commitment

Operationally, the market faced:

  • Continued intake limitations early in the week.
  • Uneven barge availability, with some vessels fully booked and others idle.
  • A wait-and-see approach driven by rapidly changing water forecasts.

Takeaway: As a result, pricing reflected risk management, not urgency.

Conclusion

The Rhine barge freight market during 5–9 January entered the new year cautiously, shaped more by hydrological uncertainty than by demand fundamentals. While activity gradually recovered as holiday absences faded, frequent changes in water level forecasts capped momentum and encouraged postponement of spot decisions. Freight rates responded selectively, firming briefly where intake constraints were most acute before stabilizing again as expectations of higher water levels emerged. The market closed the week balanced but undecided, with direction likely to be determined by whether forecasted river recovery materializes in the weeks ahead.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

December 2025: Oversupply Fears Grow as Higher Crude Oil Stocks are expected

December confirmed a clear shift in market direction. Where earlier months were dominated by tight balances and strong backwardation, year-end trading increasingly reflected oversupply expectations for 2026, easing supply concerns, and softening product demand. Crude prices declined further, product cracks weakened across most products, and forward curves, particularly for fuel oil, moved into a stronger contango. For tank terminal operators, December marked the transition from throughput-driven tightness toward a market preparing for higher inventories and potential storage demand in the year ahead.

1. Crude Markets: Prices Slide as 2026 Oversupply Dominates Sentiment

Brent crude fell further in December, declining from around $63/barrel to near $61/barrel, as markets focused on weakening demand expectations. The IEA revised its 2026 outlook lower, but even with reduced projections, markets remain concerned about the system’s ability to absorb surplus volumes without significant stock builds.

Key drivers shaping crude sentiment included:

  • Expectations of a Russia–Ukraine ceasefire, which could restore some Russian supply.
  • Saudi price cuts for Asian customers signaling competitive pressure and surplus availability.
  • Rising US and Chinese strategic stock purchases, temporarily absorbing excess barrels.

Despite ongoing backwardation in the Brent curve, spreads narrowed notably, and longer-dated contracts increasingly price in contango from late 2026 onwards.

Takeaway: Crude markets are no longer driven by immediate scarcity but by forward-looking oversupply risk, setting the stage for structurally higher inventories.

2. Forward Curves: Fuel Oil Leads the Shift Toward Contango

Forward curve dynamics in December diverged clearly by product group:

  • Middle distillates remained backwardated, but front-end prices saw a small increase due to rising uncertainty in oil markets.
  • Gasoline (RBOB) stayed firmly in contango, supported by seasonal stock builds and expectations of higher US prices in early 2026.
  • Fuel oil showed the most pronounced structural change, with a steep drop in HSFO prices, and LSFO curves forming a clear contango, albeit still too shallow to fully cover storage costs.

The emergence of contango in fuel oil reflects oversupplied spot markets, and soft bunker demand, and growing inventories across some major hubs.

Takeaway: Fuel oil is the first product signaling a structural shift in market balance, with implications for tank utilization heading into 2026.

3. Storage Economics: Negative Overall, but Improving at the Margin

Break-even (BE) storage rates remained negative for most products, confirming that storage economics were still unattractive in December. However, trends point to gradual improvement, especially in fuel oil and gasoline structures. Key BE indications included:

  • LS Gasoil and Jet: deeply negative, reflecting persistent backwardation.
  • Gasoline: mixed signals, with short-term positive BE rates but longer tenors still negative.
  • Fuel oil (LSFO/HSFO): BE rates near zero, and a small improvement for the high-sulfur grades.

Negative BE rates mean future prices still do not compensate for storage costs, but December showed the least punitive storage environment since summer.

Takeaway: While storage plays remain largely uneconomic, December suggests the market is moving closer to a turning point where selective products may soon justify longer tank occupancy.

4. Product Cracks: Broad Weakness as Supply Normalizes

Product crack spreads weakened further in December:

  • Gasoil and diesel cracks fell sharply as supplies on both sides of the Atlantic increased
  • Jet fuel margins declined on the week
  • Gasoline cracks softened and remained below the gasoil and diesel cracks
  • Fuel oil cracks dropped further, supported by lower fuel oil prices

Refinery margins in Northwest Europe deteriorated, with Brent cracking margins falling toward $8–9/barrel, while hydroskimming margins dropped to multi-year lows.

Takeaway: Refinery economics no longer support aggressive runs, pointing to a calmer throughput environment and fewer sudden volume spikes for terminals.

5. Global Stocks: Inventories Begin to Build

Global stock data for December confirms the early stages of inventory rebuilding:

  • UGlobal stock data for December confirms the early stages of inventory rebuilding:
  • ARA: light ends stabilized, middle distillates showed slight draws, heavy stocks edged higher
  • Singapore: heavy product stocks decreased, while the middle and light segments increased
  • Fujairah: heavy ends continued to build, while middle distillates stabilized

The regional divergence highlights that oversupply pressures are emerging unevenly, but the overall direction is upward.

Takeaway: Rising stocks reinforce the shift away from scarcity-driven logistics toward inventory management and storage optimization.

Conclusion

December closed the year with a decisive change in market narrative. Falling crude prices, weakening product cracks, and narrowing backwardation all point toward a market preparing for oversupply rather than reacting to shortage. While storage economics remain largely negative, the improvement seen in fuel oil and gasoline structures suggests that the foundations for renewed storage demand are forming. For tank terminals, the focus remains on efficient throughput and operational flexibility in the near term, but December’s signals indicate that 2026 may bring a return of longer-term inventory plays. Terminals that are ready to adapt from high-turnover logistics to inventory-driven utilization will be best positioned as the market cycle turns.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

ARA Freight Market: Post-Holiday Reset Brings Strong Rebound in Activity and Firming Rates

The ARA barge freight market closed 2025 and entered the new year with a clear change in momentum. After a subdued and fragmented holiday period, activity rebounded sharply, supported by the release of delayed barges, renewed chartering interest, and a collective effort to reset logistics for early January. This resulted in broad-based freight rate increases at the end of December, followed by stabilization and selective corrections as the new year began.

1. Freight Rates: Year-End Firming Followed by Early-January Normalization

  • 29 December: The first trading session after Christmas saw a strong uplift in freight rates across most ARA routes, as charterers returned to the market and operators worked to reposition barges that had become idle over the holidays. Prompt availability tightened quickly, giving operators renewed pricing power.
  • 30 December: Firm sentiment carried over into the following day. Although overall demand softened slightly compared to the previous session, freight rates increased further on the majority of routes, reflecting continued competition for prompt barges and efforts to secure employment ahead of the New Year break.
  • 31 December: Trading slowed markedly on the final day of the year. Despite hectic operational activity and numerous renominations, freight rates remained unchanged, as low liquidity prevented further directional movement.
  • 2 January: The first session of 2026 reopened on a calm note before gaining momentum. Middle distillate rates held steady, while light ends saw small downward adjustments on selected routes, signaling that the post-holiday tightening was easing into a more balanced market.

Takeaway: The period marked a classic post-holiday reset: sharp firming as the market reopened, followed by early stabilization once logistics normalized.

2. Market Activity: From Holiday Hangover to Strong Reopening

  • Late December: Activity surged immediately after Christmas, as both charterers and operators rushed to re-establish flows disrupted by holiday delays. Volumes rebounded strongly on 29–30 December, reflecting pent-up demand rather than a structural shift in consumption.
  • Year-end slowdown: On 31 December, spot volumes dropped sharply as many desks closed early and only essential business was concluded.
  • Early January: On 2 January, activity recovered again, supported by renewed fixing interest and the absence of widespread empty barges, indicating that demand was sufficient to keep fleets occupied.

Takeaway: Activity patterns were driven by calendar effects and logistics, not by shifts in underlying demand.

3. Product Dynamics: Distillates Stable, Light Ends More Responsive

  • Middle distillates led the late-December rebound and remained stable into early January, supported by steady baseline demand and limited prompt availability immediately after the holidays.
  • Light ends reacted more quickly to changes in barge availability. After participating in the year-end firming, rates corrected slightly in early January as logistics smoothed out and competitive pressure returned.

Takeaway: This divergence highlights the greater trading activity of light ends compared to middle distillates.

4. Operational Context: Renominations and Repositioning Shape the Market

Operational factors were central throughout the period:

  • Holiday-related delays resulted in extensive renominations, keeping operators busy even on days with limited new fixing.
  • Some barges became empty during the Christmas break, creating a brief window of tightness once the market reopened.
  • By early January, contract work and improved planning reduced pressure on spot availability, restoring balance.

Conclusion

The ARA barge freight market between 29 December and 2 January reflected a textbook transition from holiday disruption to early-year normalization. A sharp rebound in activity and firming freight rates immediately after Christmas were driven by logistical repositioning and pent-up fixing requirements rather than a structural improvement in demand. As the calendar turned, market conditions stabilized quickly: middle distillate rates held firm, light ends adjusted modestly, and barge availability returned to more balanced levels. The period closed with the ARA market reset, operationally aligned for January, and poised to respond to demand signals rather than calendar-driven urgency.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

Rhine Freight Market: Low Water Levels Drive Rate Increases into the New Year

The Rhine barge market closed 2025 and entered 2026 with a clear shift toward tighter conditions, despite subdued demand and limited market participation during the holiday period. While overall activity remained uneven, persistently falling water levels became the dominant force shaping freight sentiment, leading to broad-based rate increases, particularly on Middle and Upper Rhine routes.

The period from 29 December to 2 January demonstrated how hydrological constraints can outweigh seasonal demand softness, even in a typically quiet year-end environment.

1. Freight Rates: Broad Increases Despite Thin Holiday Liquidity

  • 29 December: The week opened with a sharp pickup in spot activity, as charterers rushed to secure tonnage ahead of further water level declines. Freight rates increased across most destinations, led by the Upper Rhine, where reduced intakes immediately translated into higher pricing. Even on the Lower Rhine, higher levels were actively discussed, signaling a tightening tone across the system.
  • 30 December: Momentum continued, with another round of rate increases on most routes. Both charterers and operators were active, anticipating further intake limitations in the coming days. With many barges tied up in contract work, spot availability tightened, reinforcing upward pressure on freight.
  • 31 December: Trading slowed markedly as year-end closures took effect, but rates still edged higher on selected routes, reflecting ongoing negotiations and the expectation of continued hydrological stress. With most vessels already occupied into the first days of January, operators showed limited flexibility.
  • 2 January: The new year began quietly, with only limited spot activity as many market participants remained out of office. Nevertheless, freight rates increased again, particularly on Middle and Upper Rhine destinations, as water levels fell further and loading volumes were significantly reduced. Higher pricing was used to compensate for sharply lower intakes.

Takeaway: Freight rates rose consistently throughout the period, driven almost entirely by restricted intakes, not by a rebound in demand.

2. Water Levels: The Decisive Market Driver

Hydrological conditions deteriorated steadily:

  • Kaub fell below the psychologically important 100 cm level and was forecast to remain extremely low, severely restricting barge intakes.
  • Maxau also declined further, offering little relief for Upper Rhine logistics.
  • Forecasts showed no near-term recovery, reinforcing conservative intake planning and higher freight expectations.

Takeaway: As a result, nominations were frequently reduced to significantly lower cargo sizes, forcing operators to reprice voyages accordingly.

3. Market Activity: Early Urgency, Then Holiday Calm

  • Activity peaked on 29–30 December, as charterers moved quickly to lock in capacity before water levels dropped further.
  • By 31 December, participation fell sharply due to early desk closures and holiday absences.
  • On 2 January, demand remained weak, with most movements focused on minimum supply-chain requirements, rather than trading-driven fixtures.

Takeaway: Despite thin liquidity, pricing remained firm, underscoring the strength of the logistical constraint.

4. Operational Context: Tight Intakes, Busy Barges

Operationally, several factors reinforced the firmer tone:

  • Many barges were already committed to contract work, limiting spot availability.
  • Weekend and holiday delays required renominations, further complicating scheduling.
  • Lower water levels forced operators to prioritize cargo selection and voyage economics.

Takeaway: Together, these elements shifted the balance of risk firmly toward operators, even in a quiet market.

Conclusion

The Rhine barge market between 29 December and 2 January illustrated a classic hydrology-driven tightening phase. While demand remained subdued due to the holiday period and lingering, but weaker, backwardation, sharply falling water levels on the Middle and Upper Rhine restricted intakes to such an extent that freight rates rose steadily into the new year. Early-week urgency gave way to holiday calm, but pricing remained firm throughout, supported by limited barge availability and reduced loadable volumes. As 2026 begins, the Rhine market enters January structurally tight from a logistical standpoint, with water levels, not demand, set to remain the key driver of freight dynamics.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!

ARA Freight Market: Holiday Liquidity Spike Followed by Abrupt Year-End Standstill

The ARA barge freight market experienced a brief but intense burst of activity at the start of the Christmas week, followed by an almost complete collapse in liquidity as the holiday period took hold. While demand peaked sharply on Monday as charterers finalized year-end programs, the momentum proved short-lived. By Christmas Eve, the market was effectively closed, with minimal spot activity and freight rates stabilizing after midweek softness.

1. Freight Rates: Early Support Gives Way to Broad Softening

  • 22 December: The market opened with strong upward pressure on activity, driven by a surge in demand for middle distillates. Freight rates for light ends increased, while middle distillates remained broadly stable, reflecting a tight balance between strong demand and already well-booked fleets. The day marked the highest trading volume of the year, underlining the urgency to secure barges before the holidays
  • 23 December: The tone shifted noticeably. Trading activity dropped sharply as the pre-holiday rush faded, and freight rates moved lower across nearly all routes. Despite fewer barges being available for prompt loading, the absence of fresh demand led to downward pressure on both middle distillates and light ends.
  • 24 December: Christmas Eve trading was extremely limited, with only a handful of residual fixtures concluded. Freight rates remained unchanged, effectively locking in the weaker levels established the day before. Market sentiment was calm but inert, with both charterers and operators stepping away from the spot market.

Takeaway: The week followed a classic year-end pattern: an early surge driven by urgency, followed by rapid disengagement and rate stabilization.

2. Spot Activity: One Final Surge Before the Market Shuts Down

Trading activity was a defining feature of the week:

  • Activity peaked dramatically on 22 December, as charterers completed last outstanding movements and renominated delayed barges.
  • By 23 December, volumes had fallen sharply as most market participants declared themselves covered.
  • On 24 December, spot trading dropped to near-minimum levels, reflecting a market that was operationally open but commercially inactive.

Takeaway: This sharp volume contraction underscores how brief increases in demand, rather than structural demand drove late-December activity.

3. Product Trends: Distillates Lead, Light Ends Fade

  • Middle distillates dominated activity throughout the period, particularly on 22 December, as fuel-related flows took priority ahead of year-end.
  • Light ends played a secondary role, with fewer fixtures and declining freight sentiment once the initial surge passed.
  • By Christmas Eve, neither product group showed meaningful momentum, confirming the market’s seasonal pause.

4. Operational Context: Well-Booked Fleets, But No Pricing Power

Operationally, the market displayed an unusual combination:

  • Fleets were largely booked due to the intense activity earlier in the week.
  • Yet, despite reduced prompt availability, freight rates softened, as demand evaporated faster than supply tightened.
  • Many remaining deals were concluded on lump-sum or PJK B/L basis, limiting their influence on published freight levels.

Takeaway: This dynamic highlights how demand timing, not vessel scarcity, dictated pricing.

Conclusion

The ARA barge freight market during 22–24 December encapsulated the transition from year-end urgency to holiday standstill. An exceptional surge in activity at the start of the week, driven by last-minute chartering and widespread renominations, briefly supported freight sentiment, particularly for light ends. However, once these requirements were covered, demand fell away abruptly, pulling freight rates lower and freezing market activity by Christmas Eve. The period closed with fleets largely positioned, prices stabilized, and the ARA market firmly entering its seasonal holiday pause, leaving any meaningful directional movement to early January.

What’s next?

Are you ready to face your challenges head-on?

We now offer a FREE customized trial to our BargeINSIGHTS tool, an all-in-one platform for liquid bulk barge transport optimization.

With BargeINSIGHTS, you get instant insights into barge freight rates, bunker gas oil prices, water levels, vessel tracking, and barge availability—all in one place. No more time-consuming data collection; everything you need is at your fingertips.

Click here to schedule your demo and get access to BargeINSIGHTS for free!