Port of Antwerp-Bruges to Expand Port Lumut into a Maritime Hub

The Port of Antwerp-Bruges and the Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Perak (PKNP), a state development agency in Malaysia, have forged a strategic cooperation to develop the Port of Lumut.

According to the Port of Antwerp-Bruges, the European Commission has awarded a €1.9 million ($2 million) grant for feasibility studies, recognising the port’s potential as a logistics and industrial hub. For the Port of Antwerp-Bruges, this is the first major project in Southeast Asia.

Malaysia lies in a major international shipping lane between the Strait of Malacca and the South China Sea.

Lumut, in Perak state, is a small port between Kuala Lumpur in the south and Penang in the north. The Port of Antwerp Bruges feels that the port has good potential as a logistical and industrial hub.

Port of Antwerp Bruges International (PoABI), a subsidiary of the Port of Antwerp-Bruges, provides advice, management solutions, investment projects, and training to international ports and terminals. PoABI and PKNP established a development business as part of the Port of Lumut development.

This organisation brings together PKNP’s local experience and network with PoABI’s worldwide competence in project management, port administration, and training to enable the establishment and operation of the Lumut Maritime Industrial Cluster (LUMIC).

The strategic partnership intends to transform Lumut into a world-class marine centre and a driving force for Perak’s economy.

Kristof Waterschoot, Managing Director PoABI, said: “The official establishment of this development company underlines our commitment to the development of LUMIC.

“Together with our partner PKNP, we are ready to create a sustainable industrial cluster, which will not only boost the local economy, but also contribute to the broader vision of progress and innovation for the state of Perak in Malaysia.”

After similar projects in Duqm and Namibia, this is PoABI’s first major project in Southeast Asia.

Given its strategic position and international investors’ strong belief in Malaysia as the future hub of the logistics chain, the European Union has approved a grant of €1.9 million ($2 million).

This grant will be used to conduct multiple feasibility studies. Four Malaysia investigations are reportedly ongoing, providing the framework for a focused approach in 2024.

In the following year, PoABI noted that efforts will be focused on Lumut and if this port can serve as a gateway to Europe. This will concentrate on the proposed master plan for LUMIC.

In November, the Port of Antwerp-Bruges chosen Milence, a joint venture between Daimler Truck, Volvo Group, and the TRATON GROUP, to develop two charging hubs at the Truck Parking Goordijk and Ketenis.

Port Technology, Dom Magli, December 21, 2023

ARA Oil Product Stocks Down (Week 51)

Oil products Blendstocks Diesel-heating oil-gasoil Gasoline Jet fuel-kerosine Naphtha Fundamentals Inventories

Independently-held oil product stocks at the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) trading hub dipped in the week to 20 December, according to data from consultancy Insights Global.

Jet fuel stocks shed on the week, a mix of rising demand in the run-up to the Christmas holidays and fewer cargoes arriving in ARA via the Red Sea due to the disruption to shipping stemming from attacks by Yemen’s Houthi rebels in and around the key waterway. Any tightness in jet fuel supply in ARA is unlikely to be prolonged, according to Insights Global.

Gasoline inventories in ARA fell on the week, driven by less gasoline blending, not because of higher demand, Insights Global said. As gasoline demand inland and for export dwindles, blending activity has decreased.

Gasoil stocks slipped. Market participants suggest higher carbon taxes in Germany next year new year could support buying in the last few weeks of 2023. But Insights Global expects high water levels on the Rhine to constrain shipments from ARA inland.

Higher demand from the petrochemical sector underpinned draws on naphtha stocks in ARA, which dropped in the week to 20 December. Fuel oil inventories bucked the trend, growing, as export economics to Singapore become less workable.

By Anya Fielding

France’s TotalEnergies to Invest Billions in Nigeria

French energy giant TotalEnergies is ready to invest $6 billion (5.5 billion euro) over several years in Nigeria’s oil and energy industry, especially in gas and offshore projects.

Nigeria, Africa’s top economy and major oil producer, is looking to bring in more foreign investment since President Bola Ahmed Tinubu came to office in May with a set of economic reforms.

The OPEC member has seen its crude output on the decline in recent years due to widespread theft from pipelines and attacks and high operating costs and bureaucracy deterring on-shore investors.

Total’s announcement follows a similar pledge from Shell earlier this month looking at $6 billion in offshore, gas and liquefied gas projects.

Tinubu meet with CEO of Total Energies Worldwide Patrick Pouyanne for talks in the capital Abuja on Monday.

“We are committed to removing all cobwebs and anti-investment impediments in the oil and gas industry. We have a clear path that we are committed to pursuing. We are ready to work with you,” Tinubu said after meeting the Total team.

Nigeria a Key Market
According to the presidency statement, Pouyanne told Tinubu that Nigeria was “very important” for Total Energies, accounting for eight to 10 percent of the company’s worldwide total production.

“We are ready to invest $6 billion in the coming years. We are looking extensively at more deepwater production and gas production opportunities across the terrain,” he said.

“Everything is here. We just need to conclude with the tweaks and changes necessary to unlock the outstanding potential in both oil and gas.”

A new Nigeria law, the Petroleum Industry Act, passed in 2021 after years of debate and delays aimed to bring more foreign investment in the oil sector with amendments to regulations, royalties and taxes.

RFI, December 19, 2023

UK to Back 11 Green Hydrogen Projects Under $2.5 Bln Fund

Britain’s Energy Security Secretary, Claire Coutinho, announced on Thursday backing 11 projects to produce green hydrogen, as part of the government’s 2 billion pound ($2.5 billion) funding to be committed over the next 15 years.

The 11 successful projects, with capacity totalling 125 megawatts (MW), were selected to be offered contracts under the government’s first hydrogen allocation round (HAR1), launched in July 2022.

Britain has a target to reach net zero emissions by 2050 and green hydrogen, made by using renewable energy to split water, is seen as one of the key sectors that will help achieve this target and provide cleaner fuel for energy intensive industries and transport.

“Hydrogen presents a massive economic opportunity for the UK, unlocking over 12,000 jobs and up to 11 billion pounds of investment by 2030,” Coutinho said.

“Today’s announcement represents the largest number of commercial scale green hydrogen production projects announced at once anywhere in Europe,” she added.

In return for the government support, the successful projects will invest over 400 million pounds in the next three years, generating more than 700 jobs in local communities across the UK and delivering 125 MW of new hydrogen for businesses.

The 11 projects have been agreed at a weighted average strike price of 241 pounds per megawatt hour (MWh).

Energy Intelligence, Jason Eden, December 15 2023

ARA stocks inch lower as demand picks up (Week 50)

Independently-held product stocks at the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) trading hub edged lower in the week to 13 December according to data from Insights Global, following a draw on gasoline stocks. Dock worker strikes in Belgium, which held up loading and unloading operations last week, were concluded by the end of the week, according to the consultancy.

The data from Insights Global indicated that gasoline stocks in the ARA dropped in the week to 13 December. Significant export demand has emerged on the week, pulling gasoline cargoes to west Africa and transatlantic destinations, weighing on gasoline inventories. Inland demand started to slow down on the week, according to Insights Global, as Germany’s Miro refining joint venture has concluded maintenance at its Karlsruhe refinery.

With more refining capacity coming online, import demand for gasoil cargoes has steadily declined, increasing stocks on the week. Demand remained elevated up the Rhine as logistical disruptions along the river were still weighing on regional supply.

The arbitrage route to Singapore from ARA remained open on the week, drawing fuel oil stocks, but export opportunities could soon be gone, according to Insights Global. The most recent data from Enterprise Singapore showed that the city state’s fuel oil stocks rose to a three-month high.

Strong naphtha export demand from the Mediterranean to Asia-Pacific pushed up stocks in the northwest European market, according to Insights Global, while petrochemical demand remained weak in the region. Independently-held naphtha stocks rose by 45pc to 285,000t on the week, the highest reported number since June.

By Mykyta Hryshchuk

IEA Expects Oil Demand Slowdown to Persist in 2024 as Prices Fall on Oversupply Concerns

The International Energy Agency on Thursday said evidence of softening global oil demand is mounting and a slowdown is expected to continue into 2024, reaffirming a starkly different outlook compared with oil-producing group OPEC.

The IEA said oil market sentiment had turned “decidedly bearish” in recent weeks, even after some members of OPEC and non-OPEC oil-exporting allies — collectively known as OPEC+ — on Nov. 30 announced a new round of voluntary production cuts in the first quarter of next year.

Oil prices were higher Thursday morning, paring losses after recently falling to their lowest level since late June on gnawing oversupply concerns.

International benchmark Brent crude futures with February expiry traded 1.4% higher at $75.31 per barrel at 9 a.m. London time, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures for front-month January traded 1.3% higher at $70.36 per barrel.

In its latest monthly oil market report, the IEA said global demand was on course to rise 2.3 million barrels per day to 101.7 million barrels per day in 2023, noting that this forecast “masks the impact of a further weakening of the macroeconomic climate.”

The energy agency warned that “evidence of a slowdown in oil demand is mounting,” with the pace of expansion poised to “slow drastically” from 2.8 million barrels per day year on year in the third quarter to 1.9 million barrels per day in the final three months of 2023.

It prompted a downward revision of the IEA’s global consumption growth forecast of nearly 400,000 in the fourth quarter, with weaker-than-anticipated demand in Europe, Russia and the Middle East accounting for the bulk of that adjustment.

Looking ahead, the IEA said oil consumption growth is projected to halve next year, falling to 1.1 million barrels per day as global economic growth stays below trend in major economies, and as Covid-19-related distortions fade.

IEA vs. OPEC
OPEC, meanwhile, struck a markedly different tone in its latest monthly report.

The oil producer group, which has frequently clashed with the IEA in recent years over issues such as peak oil demand and the need for investment in new supplies, on Wednesday said that it remained “cautiously optimistic” about market dynamics in 2024.

OPEC blamed “exaggerated concerns” about oil demand growth for a recent downturn in crude prices and maintained its relatively high oil use prediction for next year.

It reaffirmed its outlook for world oil demand growth in 2023 at 2.46 million barrels per day, roughly in line with the IEA’s forecast.

For next year, OPEC said it sees world oil demand at 2.25 million barrels per day, unchanged from the previous month, but a sharply higher estimate than the IEA’s prediction of 1.1 million barrels per day for the period.

CNBC, Sam Meredith, December 14, 2023

A Big Oil Reality Check for the Energy Transition

This year’s COP28 on Tuesday ran into overtime as participating countries sought to clinch a last-minute agreement on a draft document detailing a global commitment to phase out hydrocarbons.

The reason for the overtime was the strong opposition to such a text by oil-producing countries. Some placed the blame singularly on Saudi Arabia as the leader of OPEC, and others blamed the whole cartel plus other oil producers.

What none of the blame-layers appear to have realized is that another course of action is impossible for oil-producing countries. Just as it is impossible for Big Oil to turn into Big Energy, at least not without a fight.

Earlier in the week, when OPEC’s head warned member states about possible phaseout language in the final COP28 declaration, several European government officials expressed their utter shock at such behavior. They reacted as though it made perfect sense for a dozen countries to agree to the end of their main export commodity to make some people in Europe happy. It does not make perfect sense, however. It makes no sense whatsoever.

The situation is the same with various transition advocates calling on international oil companies to do more about the transition, essentially by reducing their oil and gas production. Because the IPCC said we need to do something about rising global temperatures.

As with OPEC, this is not happening. Exxon and Chevron, two of the world’s biggest oil companies, recently announced higher capital spending plans for 2024, with most of the additional spending going into upstream activities, which usually translates as higher production.

Shell, BP, and Total have also signaled they have pretty ambitious plans for their core business, even as they invest increasingly in alternative energy such as wind and solar.

This has not made transition advocates happy. One of the most prominent of these, the International Energy Agency’s head, Fatih Birol, has called repeatedly on the industry to go all in on the transition and start making plans to wind down oil and gas. This is happening as the IEA estimates that oil demand is going to hit a record this year and continue growing over the next few years as well. It then expects a peak around 2027, but many disagree.

One of them is Bloomberg’s columnist Javier Blas who wrote in a recent piece that it was essentially silly to call on Big Oil to embrace the transition at the expense of its usual business. Citing Birol’s calls for a change, Blas pointed out two areas that Big Oil was being targeted in and the fact that in only one of these areas did it make sense for Big Oil to work harder: reducing methane emissions. Blas suggests a stick-and-carrot approach by governments in that respect to motivate more investments.

It would be easy to extend the approach to investments in wind and solar, and EV charging, but, according to Blas, this is a different case because “Where to invest depends on the profit.” It seems a lot of transition advocates have consistently failed to grasp this fact, hence the calls for Big Oil to stop being Big Oil and for oil-producing nations to embrace the shift that would alter their economies and quite likely damage them significantly.

Several Big Oil majors went down that road a few years ago. The most notable case was BP under Bernard Looney, which made massive low-carbon energy commitments and even started working on them. Just a couple of years in, a bit before his ousting, Looney admitted that the attempt at diversifying into low-carbon energy had fallen short of expectations in the return department. As a result, BP was refocusing on its core business, with a special emphasis on gas.

Right now, delegates at COP28 have scrambled to get everyone to agree to a text that might include the words “reducing both consumption and production of fossil fuels, in a just, orderly and equitable manner so as to achieve net zero by, before, or around 2050”.

Many want to make the text as obligatory as possible for every country that signs it. Others didn’t even want the words “fossil fuels” in there. The former appears to ignore the fact that committing to a reduction in the consumption of oil and gas is all very well on paper, but in reality, things stand very differently.

One look at Germany is enough evidence. Europe’s most ambitious wind and solar builder has boosted coal power generation because it needs energy and no longer has nuclear power plants to generate it from. Despite wind and solar. Similar examples abound all over the world, with China being also notable for its “All of the above” approach towards energy sources.

Whatever COP28 delegates come up with in the end, oil and gas demand is going nowhere anytime soon unless, of course, governments bite the bullet and mandate lower energy consumption. It might sound far-fetched and risky today, but it is not out of the question.

If reducing emissions from oil and gas consumption is your priority number-one, then all measures, including mandating consumption cuts are allowed. Or perhaps there may come a time when priorities get rearranged, as they did last year in Europe.

OilPrice.com, Irina Slav, December 13, 2023

3 Big Issues for Liquid Terminals

Liquid terminals occupy an understated corner of the American economy, there is no doubt.

But think about it; our members offer an example of the way things should work when the country is operating at its best. Tank terminals are essential hubs for supply chains, getting products where they are supposed to be when they’re supposed to be there.

As the International Liquid Terminals Association (ILTA) approaches its 50-year anniversary, three issues are drawing our attention. They are the energy transition, infrastructure and fire safety.

The inevitable energy transition
ILTA members have long been planning for the energy transition. We are partners in fuel storage, and we see a day when the products we handle will increasingly consist of hydrogen, biofuels, ammonia and other products.

As we contemplate a world fueled by low-carbon energy, the terminal industry will be part of the solution. Clean hydrogen is a primary way to decarbonize many segments of our economy.

In 2021, President Joe Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which included $9.5 billion for clean hydrogen. Last year’s Inflation Reduction Act provides a hydrogen production tax credit that will boost the U.S. market.

California has announced its Hydrogen Market Development Strategy, which includes an “infrastructure strike team” to help develop hydrogen storage and distribution that supports production and demand growth.

Several companies are also taking steps to develop hydrogen. Chevron and Cummins recently announced an MOU to “leverage complementary positioning in hydrogen, natural gas and other lower carbon fuel value chains.”

Initiatives like this will create new markets, and liquid terminals will play a key role in connecting the producer to the end user.

Infrastructure
Aging infrastructure is disrupting the flow of goods throughout the country. Clogged ports, crumbling roads and bridges and gridlocked rail systems have all created logistics problems, and the need for infrastructure investment is clear. The American Society of Civil Engineers released a report card in 2021 that gave America’s overall infrastructure a grade of C-minus. That’s why passage of the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure law was so important.

Terminal facilities are in more than 700 American communities, generating good-paying jobs and supporting local governments through property taxes.

The infrastructure law includes money to improve the rural transport infrastructure. This could give companies new options for sourcing, storing and transporting goods.

Fire safety
Recently, a class of chemicals called per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, has drawn the attention of news outlets and policymakers.

In an editorial in Roll Call, Sen. Shelly Moore Caputo (R-WV) argued that Congress should deliver solutions that reduce risks posed by PFAS in a scientific, bipartisan and responsible manner. Politico has written about the tricky business of assigning liability for PFAS contamination. Meanwhile, there are now conflicting PFAS policies at the state level.

ILTA recognizes the science showing that new technologies must supplant PFAS. Our members support a uniform nationwide transition away from PFAS-based firefighting foams. ILTA is working with the Natural Resources Defense Council and the International Association of Firefighters on legislation to provide a safe and achievable path away from PFAS-based firefighting foams nationwide.

Additionally, we support legislation that would properly address liability for PFAS pollution. We believe that the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund), as currently written, is the wrong approach to regulating PFAS chemicals that were used in legacy fire-fighting foams.

By classifying PFAS as a “hazardous substance” under CERCLA, terminal operators would be made legally and financially responsible for simply adhering to best safety practices and OSHA regulations for fire suppression.

BIC Magazine, Kathryn Clay, December 12, 2023

Belgian and Houston-Based Partners to Work Jointly on Green Shipping Corridor

Industry stakeholders from Belgium and Houston have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that will see them cooperate on the energy transition.

The six partners involved are the Center for Houston’s Future, Waterstofnet, Port Houston, the Port of Antwerp-Bruges, Exmar, and the Blue Sky Maritime Coalition. Under the MoU, the signing of which was overseen by Belgian Prime Minister Alexander de Croo in Houston yesterday (10 December), the partners have agreed to work together on a green shipping corridor, as well as an import-export coalition for renewable and low-carbon molecules and the exchange of best practices, knowledge, and research.

‘We look forward to continuing to work with Belgium and other stakeholders as we transition to becoming a carbon-neutral facility by 2050,’ the Port of Houston said in a social media post yesterday.

As previously reported, green corridors are one element of the US port’s carbon neutrality action plan. The Belgian port is also aiming to become climate neutral by 2050. In 2021, the Port of Antwerp (as it was formerly known) and the Port of Montreal signed a cooperation agreement to support the creation of the first green shipping corridor in the North Atlantic.

Bunkerspot, Rhys Berry, December 11, 2023

How the Gulf Region is Planning for a Life After Oil

The Gulf countries are marching ahead with an ambitious domestic transition to renewable energy. But there is little chance they will stop exporting fossil fuels any time soon.

A global shift to renewable energy might sound like an economic death knell for the Gulf region, where fossil fuel reserves make for a seemingly limitless stream of wealth. But the world’s energy powerhouse is embracing the inevitable shift away from fossil fuels — at least domestically.

Countries such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are building some of the world’s largest renewable power plants as they wean themselves off fossil fuels.

In the run-up to the 2022 FIFA World Cup, Qatar built a solar plant designed to meet 10% of the country’s peak energy needs. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, is creating a desert city that will run exclusively on renewables. Neom, as it’s called, will have its own solar-fueled green hydrogen plant. The UAE, which is hosting this year’s UN climate conference, is constructing what is being touted as the world’s largest single-site solar power plant.

Projects such as these will help Saudi Arabia meet the target of producing 50% of its electricity with renewables by 2030 and the UAE achieve 44% by 2050, according to both countries. For now, however, the UAE and Saudi Arabia sit alongside other Gulf states — Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait and Qatar — in the 15 worst emitters. Top of the list was Qatar, with a per capita output of 35.59 tons of CO2 in 2021, compared to 8.09 tons per person in Germany. Moving down the ranking will require serious momentum.

Mohammad Al-Saidi, a research associate professor at Qatar University’s Center for Sustainable Development, told DW that the region is moving very quickly to fulfil its ambitious goals.

Freeing up oil for export
Transforming the economies to renewable energy isn’t purely out of concern for the environment, though. Al-Saidi said one of the main motivators for the transition is to free up fossil fuel reserves for export, thereby maximising profits.

In 2020, Saudi Arabia was the fourth-largest consumer of oil in the world, and the sixth-largest consumer of fossil gas, leaving less to be lucratively sold abroad.

Despite rising temperatures and the increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events linked to burning fossil fuels, demand for oil is projected to increase until about 2040. Once demand eventually fades, any oil left in the ground will become a “stranded asset” and a missed opportunity for profit, as the oil producers see it.

Another significant motivator for the domestic shift toward renewable economies is to attract international investment and maintain standing in the international community, Al-Saidi explained. “This is very important for image, and image means money.”

Transitioning to a renewables-based economy would make countries far more attractive for foreign money, said Jon Truby, a visiting law professor at the UK’s Newcastle University who studies connections between sustainability and technology.

Climate crisis hits home
Though continuing to export oil will fill the region’s coffers, it could also threaten its very existence. As other countries keep burning fossil fuels extracted from Saudi Arabia and its neighbours, global temperatures will continue to rise. And the Gulf stands to be disproportionately affected.

A global rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) by 2050 would likely mean a 4-degree rise in the Gulf. Heat waves of over 50 degrees Celsius have already hit the region, and average temperatures are well above the rest of the world.

Average summer maximum temperatures will likely exceed survivability levels in most of the Gulf under some climate change scenarios. Planetary heating will also worsen dust storms, and low-lying areas could be affected by rising sea levels.

“They are in a paradox because they’re depending upon the oil revenues, but they’re also at great risk of climate change in their own countries,” said Truby.

Gambling on carbon capture and storage
In an effort to keep exporting fossil fuels, while limiting the risk of climate damage, the region is placing its bets on carbon capture and storage.

CCS, as the technology is known, is a process by which emissions are intercepted and squirrelled underground or into other products. It has long been seen as the holy grail for oil producers because it could theoretically mean fossil fuels could be burned without adding to climate change.

But decades of research have failed to produce large-scale solutions, and climate activists see it as a dangerous distraction from true climate action.

​So far, less than 0.1% (43 million tons) of global emissions are captured by such technology. The current pipeline of projects is estimated to increase that to just half a per cent by 2030, according to Bloomberg.

Nonetheless, the technology is poised to be widely discussed in the annual UN climate summit to be held in the UAE and has been identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as one of the required steps to limit warming to 1.5 degrees. COP28 President-designate Sultan al-Jaber called for a greater focus on carbon capture and storage capacity in a speech setting out his agenda for the talks.

“In a pragmatic, just and well-managed energy transition, we must be laser-focused on phasing out fossil fuel emissions while phasing and scaling up viable, affordable zero-carbon alternatives,” he said.

However, the European Union and other nations have opposed this approach, saying the focus should be on phasing out fossil fuels rather than abatement technologies.

The Gulf region aims to diversify
Eventually, though, the money tap will be switched off. With the International Monetary Fund warning that reduced demand for oil might eat away the region’s coffers in just 15 years, moves are afoot to find alternative streams of revenue.

Saudi Arabia is betting on green hydrogen production, as well as building up an industry of renewable-powered commodities production such as aluminium along with the UAE. On a less sustainable front, it’s also starting to use its hydrocarbons for plastic and petrochemical production.

Exporting solar power has been touted as a huge economic opportunity. In the Gulf countries, ​​each square meter of land fitted with solar could yield the same amount of energy each year as 1.1 barrels of oil.

Other states are looking to copy the diversification model of Dubai, where fossil fuels now account for only about 5% of its income. The vast majority comes instead from tourism, and wealthy migrants and investors, according to Al-Saidi.

​​​Oman appears to be one of the most ambitious for reducing reliance on fossil fuels. ​​Oil made up 39% of its GDP in 2017, but it plans to reduce this to 8.4% by 2040 with a focus on tourism, logistics and manufacturing.

This varying ambition across the region relies on the Gulf states exploiting their fossil fuel reserves to fund a transition to a future free of fossil fuels. The irony is not lost on environmentalists and human rights activists.

Agnes Callamard, secretary-general of Amnesty International, has called on countries such as Saudi Arabia to leave its oil reserves in the ground.

“It is past time that Saudi Arabia acted in humanity’s interest and supported the phasing out of the fossil fuel industry, which is essential for preventing further climate harm,” she said earlier this year.

The Business Standard, Alistair Walsh, December 7, 2023